Mark Whitehouse vs Michael Lippens Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L L W L
Form
L W L W W L L W L LHead-To-Head: Whitehouse 1 - 0 Lippens
They have played 3 sets in total, with Whitehouse winning 2 and Lippens winning 1. The last match between Whitehouse and Lippens was at the USA F15 (Vero Beach), 24-04-2017, Q1 round, Clay with Mark Whitehouse getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mark Whitehouse | 1 |
| Michael Lippens | 0 |
USA F15 (Vero Beach)(24-04-2017)
6
7
6
4
6
2
| Whitehouse | Stats | Lippens |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 894 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 523 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 31 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 50% (195-194) | Career Total W/L | 45% (25-30) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Muller VS Humbert PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Whitehouse VS Lippens H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | |||||
Whitehouse VS Lippens H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mark Whitehouse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
James Watt
Player
Mark Whitehouse
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Kousuke Ogura
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Mark Whitehouse
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Mark Whitehouse
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Finn Bass
48%
(
26 of
54)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Mark Whitehouse
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
112)
13
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
50 of
73)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Luke Simkiss
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
9
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
12 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robert Strombachs
Player
Mark Whitehouse
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
110)
9
Aces
16
5
Double Faults
5
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
55 of
72)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
30 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
7-5 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Oleksandr Ponomar
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Whitehouse
Player
Jonas Keck
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Michael Lippens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-2 7-6(12) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Pre-Q | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (195/194) | Win/Loss | 45% (25/30) |
| 50% (450/443) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (57/64) |
| 50% (4319/4238) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (538/549) |
| 51% (117/111) | Hard Win/Loss | 43% (10/13) |
| 46% (19/22) | Clay Win/Loss | 45% (13/16) |
| 49% (44/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 48% (15/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 1520 | Aces Total | 4 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.01 |
| 744 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 451.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 208.31 |
| 65% (13204/20389) | 1st Serve % | 63% (152/242) |
| 68% (9019/13204) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (103/152) |
| 47% (3407/7185) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (39/90) |
| 41% (781/1904) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (10/22) |
| 39% (7760/20118) | Return Points Win % | 40% (97/244) |
| 0% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (16/22) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (179/170) | Futures W/L | 45% (25/30) |
| 50% (194/386) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (25/55) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (58/122) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (5/13) |
| 48% (57/118) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 82% (201/164) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (28/24) |
| 17% (201/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (28/4) |
| 16% (188/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (27/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
